Ideal for designers and non-FEA engineers, StressCheck®-Powered Apps represent an upgrade over traditional engineering templates, such as home-grown spreadsheets and over-simplified solutions. With an increasing push for standardization and more simulation governance, ESRD began developing tools like the CAE Handbook and the StressCheck® Tool Box, as well as pioneering customized, FEA-based design templates.
StressCheck®-Powered Apps are easy to use and deploy, with no FEA knowledge needed.
Wouldn’t it be nice to have a standardized, digital repository of parameterized models frequently used for supporting design decisions? Wouldn’t it be even nicer to have these models developed, documented and certified by experts to conform to best practices? CAE Handbook powered by StressCheck® puts the power of numerical simulation in the hands of designers, engineers and analysts. Meet the FEA tool you have been waiting for.
StressCheck® Tool Box
Through StressCheck® Tool Box you can access smart applications designed for your specific requirements by expert analysts. These are tools that help you improve your designs efficiently, utilizing the latest developments in CAE in a user-friendly environment, with built-in documentation, designed for designers, engineers and analysts.
ESRD will develop customized engineering tools powered by FEA that can be stand-alone desktop applications or analysis tools that are deployed via Internet through web pages. Contact us to learn more about the many different types of applications developed by ESRD, or to discuss an application development contract for your business needs.
StressCheck®-Powered App Updates
Keep up to date on the latest StressCheck®-Powered App updates and enhancements.
Typical updates include:
- Upgrades to CAE Handbook and StressCheck® Tool Box (SCTB)
- New CAE Handbook templates
- User-reported bug fixes
Recent News & Events
Many organizations equate the credibility of simulation results with the experience and judgment of their senior analysts. Without diminishing the value of senior analysts, an evidence-based approach to simulation credibility will reduce both the technical risk of producing incorrect simulation results and management’s risk in the use of simulation results in a decision-making context.
Dr. William OberkampfNAFEMS Tutor and Engineering Consultant