• About
    • Who We Are
    • Partners & Providers
    • News & Events
    • The ESRD Blog
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Applications
    • What We Solve
    • Detailed Stress
    • Composites
    • Fracture Mechanics
    • Residual Stress
    • Sim Apps
  • Products
    • What We Develop
    • StressCheck Professional
      • StressCheck Core
      • Solvers
      • Advanced Modules
      • Utilities
      • Academic Licensing
    • StressCheck Apps
      • CAE Handbook
      • StressCheck Tool Box
    • Product Updates
  • Support
    • How We Can Help
    • Training
    • Webinars
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Help Documentation
    • Software FAQ’s
  • Simulation
    • How We Simulate
    • Benchmarks
    • Simulation Governance
    • History of FEA
    • Dictionary & Terms
  • Resources
    • Browse Our Resource Library
    • White Papers
    • Case Studies
    • Product Demos
    • StressCheck Tutorials
Serving the Numerical Simulation community since 1989
  • Contact Us
  • Register
Login
Forgot Password?
Join Us
ESRDESRD
ESRDESRD
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Partners & Providers
    • News & Events
    • The ESRD Blog
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Applications
    • What We Solve
    • Detailed Stress
    • Composites
    • Fracture Mechanics
    • Residual Stress
    • Sim Apps
  • Products
    • What We Develop
    • StressCheck Professional
      • StressCheck Core
      • Solvers
      • Advanced Modules
      • Utilities
      • Academic Licensing
    • StressCheck Apps
      • CAE Handbook
      • StressCheck Tool Box
    • Product Updates
  • Support
    • How We Can Help
    • Training
    • Webinars
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Help Documentation
    • Software FAQ’s
  • Simulation
    • How We Simulate
    • Benchmarks
    • Simulation Governance
    • History of FEA
    • Dictionary & Terms
  • Resources
    • Browse Our Resource Library
    • White Papers
    • Case Studies
    • Product Demos
    • StressCheck Tutorials

StressCheck User Experience Survey Results

Home NewsStressCheck User Experience Survey Results

StressCheck User Experience Survey Results

November 26, 2018 News, Surveys

Last month we asked our FEA-minded engineering community how we should improve StressCheck Professional, and the survey results are in. Many thanks to all of our participants who took the time to complete the survey and share your experiences.

Survey Results Summary

As the survey results were intended to be anonymous, we will summarize the submissions categorically based on the selected Engineering Roles & Applications and Desired StressCheck Improvements. The submissions by percentage of survey participants are as follows:

Engineering Roles and Applications

  • Stress Analysis/Stress Concentrations – 71%
  • Fracture/Cracks/DaDT – 76%
  • Nonlinear/Cold-working/Residual Stress – 71%
  • Fastened Joints/Contact – 59%
  • Fatigue/Life – 65%
  • Structural/Displacement/Deflection – 47%
  • Global-Local/Breakout Modeling – 41%
  • Design/Strength – 29%
  • Composites/Bonded Joints/Repairs – 12%

 

The data suggests that many of our survey participants are focused on detailed analysis of parts & assemblies, including analysis of 3D cracks (e.g. SIF’s), 3D stress concentration factors (e.g. Kt’s), breakout model (e.g. global-local) and nonlinear behaviors (e.g. cold-working & residual stresses). These applications are challenging in traditional FEA tools, but typically less challenging with StressCheck’s Numerical Simulation Technology.

Currently, StressCheck is optimized to satisfy the requirements of the majority of survey participants, as well as the laminated composites design & analysis engineers. This means StressCheck’s development is trending in the right direction for its user community.

Desired StressCheck Improvements

  • 3D Crack Growth Solver – 76%
  • Large Deformation Contact Analysis – 47%
  • Bonded Contact Analysis – 24%
  • Updated GUI – 29%
  • Integration with Other Software – 53%
  • Improved Meshing Tools – 41%
  • 3D Bolt Generator App – 47%
  • Post Cold-Work Bolted Joint Analysis – 41%
  • Cutting Plane Forces/Moments – 53%
  • Import/Assign Tabular Displacements or Pressures – 12%
  • Cyclic Symmetry/Periodic BC’s – 6%
  • Tabular/Curve Fit Elastic-Plastic Material Properties – 24%
  • Multi-Threaded/Cluster Solver – 24%

 

The survey participants were overwhelmingly in support of a 3D Crack Growth Solver application (over 3/4 of survey submissions), suggesting many participants are involved in DaDT, life extension programs (e.g. ASIP) and other fracture mechanics applications. The good news is that ESRD and other technology partners are currently working on tools to support this type of application, and ESRD is involved in the ERSI program to connect technologies in support of assessing the influence of residual stresses on crack growth.

In addition, approximately half of survey participants are interested in features like Large Deformation Contact Analysis (47%), 3D Bolt Generator App (47%), and Post Cold-Work Bolted Joint Analysis (41%), indicating that detailed analysis of fastened parts is necessary in their engineering responsibilities. We will continue to work to provide features in these applications.

Again, thanks for all of your valued feedback!

Sweepstakes Winner Notification

The $50 Amazon gift card sweepstakes winner will be notified by the e-mail address you provided when you submitted the survey, so be sure to check all your inboxes in the next week.

Tags: Aerospace and DefenseNumerical SimulationStressCheckSurvey
1

You also might be interested in

ESRD’s ASME VVUQ 2023 Symposium Keynote Presentation Recording Now Available
Courtesy ASME.

ESRD’s ASME VVUQ 2023 Symposium Keynote Presentation Recording Now Available

Oct 11, 2023

In mid-May 2023, ESRD’s Co-Founder and Chairman Dr. Barna Szabó delivered a keynote presentation at the ASME VVUQ 2023 Symposium in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Dr. Szabó’s presentation, entitled “Simulation Governance: An Idea Whose Time Has Come”, will focus on the goals and means of Simulation Governance with reference to mechanical/aerospace engineering practice. We are pleased to announce that the recording of the keynote presentation is now available.

StressCheck v11 Update 1 Released!

StressCheck v11 Update 1 Released!

Jun 17, 2021

ESRD is pleased to announce that we've released StressCheck Professional v11 Update 1. In addition to all the improvements introduced with the release of StressCheck v11, in Update 1 we have optimized the Solve and Results panes for maximum efficiency and improved user flow.

Watch Teaser Video for the NAFEMS Coil Spring FEA Puzzler
Teaser Contour Plot for Coil Spring Solution

Watch Teaser Video for the NAFEMS Coil Spring FEA Puzzler

Feb 12, 2019

The deadline for the NAFEMS coil spring "FEA Puzzler" submissions has been extended through June 1st! View a teaser video of ESRD's StressCheck model and qualitative deformation results.

Leave a Reply

We appreciate your feedback!
Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Looking for Resources?

Interested in a Demo, Evaluation or Purchase?

Have a Software Question, Issue or Feature Request?

Recent News & Events

  • Trustworthiness in Simulation: Credibility or Decision-grade Reliability?
  • Beyond the Black Box: Explainable AI Requires Explainable Simulation
  • Turtle Shells and Legacy Finite Element Codes: Evolutionary Constraints in the Age of Explainable AI

Quick Links

  • Quick Start Guide
  • Documentation
  • Software FAQs
  • Software Demos

Testimonials

  • The software provides a highly reliable and user-friendly production stress analysis tool that will replace the Finite Element Method (FEM) tools and failure criteria the experts currently employ for analyzing bonded joints. The software includes an FEM-based handbook format, which allows non-experts to utilize models prepared by specialists. The handbook problems include built-in failure criteria, geometric and material nonlinearities, and the modern FEM technology provides better error control and the treatment of very large aspect ratios.”

    Dr. Stephen P. Engelstad
    Technical Fellow, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Structural Methods and Analysis

Testimonials

The software provides a highly reliable and user-friendly production stress analysis tool that will replace the Finite Element Method (FEM) tools and failure criteria the experts currently employ for analyzing bonded joints. The software includes an FEM-based handbook format, which allows non-experts to utilize models prepared by specialists. The handbook problems include built-in failure criteria, geometric and material nonlinearities, and the modern FEM technology provides better error control and the treatment of very large aspect ratios.”

Dr. Stephen P. Engelstad, Technical Fellow, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Structural Methods and Analysis

Member Portal

  • Member Registration
  • Member Login

Contact Us

© 2026 · Engineering Software Research & Development, Inc. | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookie Policy | Software License Agreement | Software Maintenance and Technical Support Policy

Prev Next

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits, as outlined in our Cookie Policy. You may adjust your cookie preferences within .

ESRD
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.