This 15-minute recorded presentation was prepared for the NAFEMS World Congress (Salzburg, October 2021). It highlights the mission-oriented nature of simulation governance and presents an example of a model development project.
September 2, 2021 @ 1:00 pm EST
Simulation Governance & Management
This webinar is now available to watch on-demand.
WEBINAR SUMMARY
The main ideas of, and the case for, simulation governance are easy to understand. The development and implementation of a plan for simulation governance is not at all easy, however, and requires careful consideration of the mission, and associated predictive model(s), at hand.
In this pre-recorded webinar, ESRD Chairman Dr. Barna Szabó addresses some of the key issues of simulation governance, including how model development must adhere to the requirements of simulation governance in order to minimize risk and magnify reliability.
Note: this webinar was originally prepared by Drs. Szabó and Actis for the NAFEMS World Congress 2021 session on Simulation Governance.
WEBINAR HIGHLIGHTS
- Why planning for simulation governance is mission-dependent
- Application of the concepts and procedures of predictive computational science: Focus on model development
- Example of a model development project: Prediction of the probability of fatigue failure of a metal part subjected to cyclic loading in the high cycle range
- Why the open-ended nature of model development projects makes the exercise of simulation governance essential
WATCH THIS WEBINAR
Looking for Resources?
Recent News & Events
Quick Links
Testimonials
-
“At DST Group, we have effectively used StressCheck over the last 10 years to determine accurate stress intensity factors. The results have been used to improve our residual strength and structural life estimates for aircraft in service with the Royal Australian Airforce, including C-130, P-3C and F/A-18 A/B. We have found it to be extremely easy to use and a very versatile code with which to create parametric models.
We have recently used StressCheck to obtain improved stress intensity factor solutions (Improved stress intensity factors for selected configurations in cracked plates and Improved stress intensity factors for a single corner crack at a loaded fastener hole) for five key generic configurations. These transferable parametric results have been published externally. One specific example is the non-linear contact analysis of a cracked, filled fastener hole, with both fastener and remote plate loading.”
Dr. Manfred Heller, Head
Structural & Damage Mechanics, DST Group